I’ve noticed the same Bitcoin address being used for deposits:
A swap service reusing one deposit address for multiple orders is concerning. It can expose transaction history and make it unclear how each payment is matched to a customer or swap. Reusing one address is a red flag because it can make payments harder to associate with individual orders and may create an opportunity for selective disputes or non-crediting of deposits. Address reuse alone doesn’t prove wrongdoing, but users should be cautious.
Don’t send BTC unless you’ve independently confirmed the deposit instructions, exact amount, and order-specific payment process through the service’s official channels.
Examples (orders → reused BTC address):
STX-MUXQE3WI88Q6
STX-MUXR43V99D29
STX-MUXR64WFOTZE
Letter of guarantee (LoG) : NO
SimpleX Chat Support : YES
Bitcointalk.org [ANN] Thread : NO
Regards,
Trêvoid
bc1qyv3edl7tg2eys84yvqk8tzhckaarm8kgyrgk3e
A swap service reusing one deposit address for multiple orders is concerning. It can expose transaction history and make it unclear how each payment is matched to a customer or swap. Reusing one address is a red flag because it can make payments harder to associate with individual orders and may create an opportunity for selective disputes or non-crediting of deposits. Address reuse alone doesn’t prove wrongdoing, but users should be cautious.
Don’t send BTC unless you’ve independently confirmed the deposit instructions, exact amount, and order-specific payment process through the service’s official channels.
Examples (orders → reused BTC address):
STX-MUXQE3WI88Q6
STX-MUXR43V99D29
STX-MUXR64WFOTZE
Letter of guarantee (LoG) : NO
SimpleX Chat Support : YES
Bitcointalk.org [ANN] Thread : NO
Regards,
Trêvoid